Nettleton v. United Parcel Service Inc

Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SCOTT NETTLETON, CASE NO. C19-1684-JCC Plaintiff, MINUTE ORDER v. Defendant.

This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ stipulated motion for leave for Plaintiff Scott Nettleton to amend the complaint (Dkt. No. 20). Defendant United Parcel Service consents to the amendment, and it is proper under Rule 15. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) (“a party may amend its pleading . . . with the opposing party’s consent”). “Once the adverse party has consented to the amendment of a pleading, the court has no control over the matter under Rule 15(a).” Fern v. United States, 213 F.2d 674, 677 (9th Cir. 1954). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the parties’ stipulated motion. Plaintiff Scott Nettleton must file the amended complaint within 14 days of this order. The amended complaint may not differ from the complaint attached to the parties’ motion at Dkt. No. 20-1. // // // DATED this 7th day of October 2020. William M. McCool Clerk of Court s/Tomas Hernandez Deputy Clerk