Nettleton v. Stephens

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Nettleton v. Stephens

6 La. 164

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 15, 1834

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 La. 164 (Nettleton v. Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nettleton v. Stephens, 6 La. 164 (La. 1834).

Pincite

Opinion

Martin, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This appeal must be dismissed at the appellant’s costs. The certificate of the clerk states that the record contains á [166]*166transcript of all the pleadings, proceedings, documents, and evidence on file in the case. There is no statement of facts, bill of exceptions, special verdict; and the appel]ant pas suffered the period fixed by law to pass, withoutanyassignment of errors apparent on the face of the record.

tificate that the ail1 thenproceed- and’ev1deree"S; file in the case, does not authoSon that auüm evidence adduced was put on file, and is therefore insufficient.

Nothing authorises the conclusion, that all the evidence adduced was put on file.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed, that this , . . - .,, appeal be dismissed with costs. x x

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This appeal must be dismissed at the appellant’s costs. The certificate of the clerk states that the record contains á [166]*166transcript of all the pleadings, proceedings, documents, and evidence on file in the case. There is no statement of facts, bill of exceptions, special verdict; and the appel]ant pas suffered the period fixed by law to pass, withoutanyassignment of errors apparent on the face of the record.

tificate that the ail1 thenproceed- and’ev1deree"S; file in the case, does not authoSon that auüm evidence adduced was put on file, and is therefore insufficient.

Nothing authorises the conclusion, that all the evidence adduced was put on file.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed, that this , . . - .,, appeal be dismissed with costs. x x

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 La. 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nettleton-v-stephens-la-1834.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack