Nettles v. State
293 So. 2d 378, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7627
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 15, 1974·No. Nos. 72-417, 72-511·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
Appellants were convicted of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and grand larceny, each arising out of the same episode, and were sentenced concurrently on both offenses. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence on the lesser offense for reasons explained in Edmond v. State, Fla.App.2d 1973, 280 So.2d 449, without requiring that the appellant be returned to the trial court. In all other respects the judgment and valid sentence are
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nettles v. State, 293 So. 2d 378, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7627 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).
293 So. 2d 378 (Nettles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hardrick v. State
293 So. 2d 135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)