Nettles v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nettles v. State

293 So. 2d 378, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7627

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 15, 1974

DocketNos. 72-417, 72-511

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 293 So. 2d 378 (Nettles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nettles v. State, 293 So. 2d 378, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7627 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellants were convicted of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and grand larceny, each arising out of the same episode, and were sentenced concurrently on both offenses. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence on the lesser offense for reasons explained in Edmond v. State, Fla.App.2d 1973, 280 So.2d 449, without requiring that the appellant be returned to the trial court. In all other respects the judgment and valid sentence are

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and HOBSON and Mc-NULTY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants were convicted of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and grand larceny, each arising out of the same episode, and were sentenced concurrently on both offenses. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence on the lesser offense for reasons explained in Edmond v. State, Fla.App.2d 1973, 280 So.2d 449, without requiring that the appellant be returned to the trial court. In all other respects the judgment and valid sentence are

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and HOBSON and Mc-NULTY, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 So. 2d 378, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nettles-v-state-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack