Nettadoz Enterprises v. Cintron Beverage Group, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedSeptember 16, 2014
Docket14-1210
StatusUnpublished

This text of Nettadoz Enterprises v. Cintron Beverage Group, LLC (Nettadoz Enterprises v. Cintron Beverage Group, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nettadoz Enterprises v. Cintron Beverage Group, LLC, (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

NETTADOZ ENTERPRISES, Appellant,

v.

CINTRON BEVERAGE GROUP, LLC, Appellee. ______________________

2014-1210 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, in Opposition Nos. 91200692 and 91200807. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

CHRISTOPHER J. FALKOWSKI, Falkowski PLLC, of Novi, Michigan, argued for appellant.

FRANK A. REINO, Fisher Zucker, LLC, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for appellee. On the brief was JEFFREY ZUCKER. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (CHEN, MAYER, and LINN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nettadoz Enterprises v. Cintron Beverage Group, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nettadoz-enterprises-v-cintron-beverage-group-llc-cafc-2014.