Nettadoz Enterprises v. Cintron Beverage Group, LLC
This text of Nettadoz Enterprises v. Cintron Beverage Group, LLC (Nettadoz Enterprises v. Cintron Beverage Group, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
NETTADOZ ENTERPRISES, Appellant,
v.
CINTRON BEVERAGE GROUP, LLC, Appellee. ______________________
2014-1210 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, in Opposition Nos. 91200692 and 91200807. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
CHRISTOPHER J. FALKOWSKI, Falkowski PLLC, of Novi, Michigan, argued for appellant.
FRANK A. REINO, Fisher Zucker, LLC, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for appellee. On the brief was JEFFREY ZUCKER. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (CHEN, MAYER, and LINN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
September 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nettadoz Enterprises v. Cintron Beverage Group, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nettadoz-enterprises-v-cintron-beverage-group-llc-cafc-2014.