Nett v. State

95 S.W.2d 697, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 703
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 17, 1936
DocketNo. 18536
StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.W.2d 697 (Nett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nett v. State, 95 S.W.2d 697, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 703 (Tex. 1936).

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the State Penitentiary for a term of one year.

There are no bills of exception or a statement 'of facts in the record. Hence the only matter to be considered is the sufficiency of the indictment, which seems to us to be in due form and charges the offense for which he was convicted.

Therefore, it is ordered that the judgment of the trial court be, and the same is, in all things affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been, examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.W.2d 697, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nett-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.