Netso v. Foss & Schneider

21 Fla. 145
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 15, 1884·No. No. 2·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The Chiee-Justice

delivered the opinion of the court:

Action of assumpsit for a quantity of beer barrels had by appellants from respondents. Verdict and judgment for plaintiffs and defendants appealed.

The errors assigned are that the verdict was against evidence, against the weight of evidence and against the law.

The testimony of plaintiffs’ witnesses and the letters written by each of the defendants to plaintiffs-relating to the cause of action were sufficient to sustain the action.

Defendant Bohlen’s testimony contradicts that offered by plaintiffs in some material respects. The question of veracity was very properly left to the jury and they have-decided it. There is nothing to show that the verdict was-controlled by anything other than a proper consideration of the testimony. Eo other question arises upon the record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Netso v. Foss & Schneider, 21 Fla. 145 (Fla. 1884).

21 Fla. 145 (Netso v. Foss & Schneider) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. Maddox
121 So. 805 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Browning v. State
41 Fla. 271 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1899)
Simms v. Hodges
34 Fla. 498 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1894)