Netac Technology Co., Ltd. v. Sandisk Corporation
This text of Netac Technology Co., Ltd. v. Sandisk Corporation (Netac Technology Co., Ltd. v. Sandisk Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
NETAC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., Appellant
v.
SANDISK CORPORATION, Appellee ______________________
2015-1630 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 95/000,384. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
WENYE TAN, Anova Law Group, PLLC, Sterling, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by XIAOQUN WU.
DARRYL J. ADAMS, Baker Botts, LLP, Austin, TX, ar- gued for appellee. Also represented by BRIAN W. OAKS; RUSSELL J. CRAIN, Dallas, TX. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MAYER and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 9, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Netac Technology Co., Ltd. v. Sandisk Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/netac-technology-co-ltd-v-sandisk-corporation-cafc-2016.