Neta v. Holder

Fourth Circuit

Neta v. Holder

520 F. App'x 175

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2013·No. No. 12-2507·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maria Da Conceicao Santos Neta, a native and citizen of Brazil, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motions to reconsider and reopen. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (2012). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re: Santos Neta (B.I.A. Nov. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maria Da Conceicao Santos Neta, a native and citizen of Brazil, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motions to reconsider and reopen. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (2012). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re: Santos Neta (B.I.A. Nov. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Neta v. Holder, 520 F. App'x 175 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

520 F. App'x 175 (Neta v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related