Nestle USA, Inc. and Ace American Insurance Company v. Keith P. Ellis

CourtCourt of Appeals of Virginia
DecidedJuly 14, 2015
Docket0528151
StatusUnpublished

This text of Nestle USA, Inc. and Ace American Insurance Company v. Keith P. Ellis (Nestle USA, Inc. and Ace American Insurance Company v. Keith P. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nestle USA, Inc. and Ace American Insurance Company v. Keith P. Ellis, (Va. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Humphreys, O’Brien and Senior Judge Bumgardner UNPUBLISHED

NESTLE USA, INC. AND ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 0528-15-1 PER CURIAM JULY 14, 2015 KEITH P. ELLIS

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

(Tenley Carroll Seli; Billy & Seli, PC, on brief), for appellants.

(Adam B. Shall; Philip J. Geib, P.C., on brief), for appellee.

Nestle USA, Inc. and Ace American Insurance Company (employer) appeal a decision of

the Workers’ Compensation Commission awarding benefits for an injury to the left shoulder of

Keith P. Ellis (claimant). Employer contends the commission erred in holding (1) claimant’s

claim for medical and indemnity benefits for his left shoulder is not barred by the statute of

limitations; (2) the exception addressed in Corporate Res. Mgmt, Inc. v. Southers, 51 Va. App.

118, 655 S.E.2d 34 (2008) (en banc), was applicable to claimant’s claim for medical and

indemnity benefits for his left shoulder; and (3) there was credible evidence that claimant

sustained a compensable injury by accident to his left shoulder on November 3, 2011. We have

reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Ellis v.

Nestle USA, Inc., VWC File No. VA00000538586 (Mar. 5, 2015). We dispense with oral

argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code

§ 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corporate Resource Management Inc. v. Southers
655 S.E.2d 34 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nestle USA, Inc. and Ace American Insurance Company v. Keith P. Ellis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nestle-usa-inc-and-ace-american-insurance-company--vactapp-2015.