Nester v. Nester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nester v. Nester

259 A.D. 1065, 22 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7983

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D. 1065 (Nester v. Nester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nester v. Nester, 259 A.D. 1065, 22 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7983 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the defendant to move for reargument at a Special Term held not more than twenty days after the service of a copy of the order [1066]*1066herein upon additional affidavits showing the consideration claimed to have been given for the making of the alleged agreement. The entry of the order for summary judgment and the entry of such judgment are stayed pending the hearing and determination of the motion for reargument. All concur. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in an action on a promissory note.) Present —■ Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the defendant to move for reargument at a Special Term held not more than twenty days after the service of a copy of the order [1066]*1066herein upon additional affidavits showing the consideration claimed to have been given for the making of the alleged agreement. The entry of the order for summary judgment and the entry of such judgment are stayed pending the hearing and determination of the motion for reargument. All concur. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in an action on a promissory note.) Present —■ Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 1065, 22 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nester-v-nester-nyappdiv-1940.