Nessly v. Swearingen

Washington County Court of Common Pleas

Nessly v. Swearingen

1 Add. 144

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County

DecidedSeptember 15, 1793

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Add. 144 (Nessly v. Swearingen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nessly v. Swearingen, 1 Add. 144 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

President.

If the plaintiff succeed, the defendant will sue Shepherd, on his contract to convey to him. If the defendant succeed, the plaintiff will sue Shepherd, on his contract to convey to him. Thus being equally bound to both, he stands as indifferent between them, as if bound to neither, and is a competent witness.

The opinion of the court was delivered to the jury in favour of the defendant; and the plaintiff then suffered a nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

President.

If the plaintiff succeed, the defendant will sue Shepherd, on his contract to convey to him. If the defendant succeed, the plaintiff will sue Shepherd, on his contract to convey to him. Thus being equally bound to both, he stands as indifferent between them, as if bound to neither, and is a competent witness.

The opinion of the court was delivered to the jury in favour of the defendant; and the plaintiff then suffered a nonsuit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Add. 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nessly-v-swearingen-pactcomplwashin-1793.