Ness v. York Township Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Ness v. York Township Board of Commissioners

96 A.3d 986

DecidedJuly 8, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 96 A.3d 986 (Ness v. York Township Board of Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ness v. York Township Board of Commissioners, 96 A.3d 986 (Pa. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

[987]*987 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Commonwealth Court commit an error of law when it determined that a Section 108 post-enactment notice, which was facially deficient, served as a shield against Petitionerfs’] claim that the underlying Zoning and SALDO Ordinances were defective and rendered moot all procedural challenges regarding the adoption of the ordinances?

The matter will be submitted on briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[987]*987 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Commonwealth Court commit an error of law when it determined that a Section 108 post-enactment notice, which was facially deficient, served as a shield against Petitionerfs’] claim that the underlying Zoning and SALDO Ordinances were defective and rendered moot all procedural challenges regarding the adoption of the ordinances?

The matter will be submitted on briefs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.3d 986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ness-v-york-township-board-of-commissioners-pa-2014.