Nesmith v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Nesmith v. State

148 So. 881, 25 Ala. App. 469, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 124

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 1933

Docket8 Div. 753.

StatusPublished

This text of 148 So. 881 (Nesmith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nesmith v. State, 148 So. 881, 25 Ala. App. 469, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 124 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

In the court below this appellant was charged with the offense of disturbing religious worship under section 3881 of the Code 1923. The prosecution was upon affidavit and warrant. The affidavit followed the form in the Code, § 4556 (form 45); hence was not subject to the demurrer interposed thereto. There were numerous witnesses examined upon the trial of this case. ' The evidence was in sharp conflict. That for the state tended to make out the case against the defendant as charged. This evidence was ample to support the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken. No other questions are presented. As no error appears, the judgment of the lower court will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

In the court below this appellant was charged with the offense of disturbing religious worship under section 3881 of the Code 1923. The prosecution was upon affidavit and warrant. The affidavit followed the form in the Code, § 4556 (form 45); hence was not subject to the demurrer interposed thereto. There were numerous witnesses examined upon the trial of this case. ' The evidence was in sharp conflict. That for the state tended to make out the case against the defendant as charged. This evidence was ample to support the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken. No other questions are presented. As no error appears, the judgment of the lower court will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 So. 881, 25 Ala. App. 469, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nesmith-v-state-alactapp-1933.