Nesbitt v. Riley
This text of 619 F. App'x 259 (Nesbitt v. Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Brian Keith Nesbitt appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Nesbitt’s motions for a preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining order in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nesbitt v. Riley, No. 0:14-cv-02788-RMG-PJG (D.S.C. filed May 1, 2015 & entered May 4, 2015). We deny Nesbitt’s motions for appointment of counsel, a preliminary injunction, and a temporary restraining order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
619 F. App'x 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nesbitt-v-riley-ca4-2015.