Nesbitt v. Nimmich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nesbitt v. Nimmich

25 A.D.2d 684, 269 N.Y.S.2d 690, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4678

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 28, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 684 (Nesbitt v. Nimmich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nesbitt v. Nimmich, 25 A.D.2d 684, 269 N.Y.S.2d 690, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, (1) plaintiff appeals (a) from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 18, 1965, which denied his motion for summary judgment against defendant Fred H. Nimmich and, (b) as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of said court, entered June 16, 1965 on reargument, as adhered to the original decision; and (2) defendant Hoyt appeals from an order of said court, entered February 18, 1965, which denied his cross motion for summary judgment against plaintiff. Order entered June 16, 1965 insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Appeals from orders entered February 18, 1965 dismissed, without costs. Plaintiff, by appealing from the order of June 16, 1965, waived his right to prosecute his appeal from the prior order (Manfra v. City of New York, 6 A D 2d 817). As to defendant Hoyt’s appeal, the printed record does not contain the order from which he has appealed. If such order were properly before us, we would affirm it.

Brennan, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, (1) plaintiff appeals (a) from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 18, 1965, which denied his motion for summary judgment against defendant Fred H. Nimmich and, (b) as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of said court, entered June 16, 1965 on reargument, as adhered to the original decision; and (2) defendant Hoyt appeals from an order of said court, entered February 18, 1965, which denied his cross motion for summary judgment against plaintiff. Order entered June 16, 1965 insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Appeals from orders entered February 18, 1965 dismissed, without costs. Plaintiff, by appealing from the order of June 16, 1965, waived his right to prosecute his appeal from the prior order (Manfra v. City of New York, 6 A D 2d 817). As to defendant Hoyt’s appeal, the printed record does not contain the order from which he has appealed. If such order were properly before us, we would affirm it.

Brennan, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 684, 269 N.Y.S.2d 690, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nesbitt-v-nimmich-nyappdiv-1966.