Nesbitt v. Myers

35 P.3d 1023, 333 Or. 35, 2001 Ore. LEXIS 914
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 30, 2001
DocketSC S48783
StatusPublished

This text of 35 P.3d 1023 (Nesbitt v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nesbitt v. Myers, 35 P.3d 1023, 333 Or. 35, 2001 Ore. LEXIS 914 (Or. 2001).

Opinion

*37 PER CURIAM

In this ballot title review proceeding, petitioner challenges an aspect of the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for a proposed initiative measure that the Secretary of State has denominated as Initiative Petition 83 (2002). We review the Attorney General’s certified ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with the requirements of ORS 250.035(2)(a) to (d). See ORS 250.085(5) (setting out standard of review).

Petitioner challenges the “no” vote result statement in the Attorney General’s certified ballot title. We have considered petitioner’s arguments and determine that they are not well taken. Accordingly, we certify to the Secretary of State the following ballot title for the proposed measure:

AMENDS CONSTITUTION: PROHIBITS ESTABLISHING, EXPANDING INMATE WORK PROGRAMS DISPLACING, SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCING OPPORTUNITIES FOR PRIVATE ENTERPRISES, NON-INMATE WORKERS
RESULT OF ‘YES” VOTE: ‘Yes” vote prohibits establishing, expanding inmate work programs displacing, significantly reducing: opportunities for pre-existing private enterprises or non-inmate workers; government, nonprofit programs employing developmentally-disabled.
RESULT OF “NO” VOTE: “No” vote retains laws granting corrections director discretion to establish, expand inmate work programs displacing, significantly reducing: pre-existing private enterprises’ opportunities; programs employing developmentally-disabled.
SUMMARY: Amends constitution. Constitution currently requires inmate work programs for state corrections institutions. Constitution currently instructs the corrections director to avoid, but grants director discretion to establish or expand, inmate work programs that would: provide goods or services to the private sector and displace or significantly reduce opportunities for pre-existing private enterprises; or displace or significantly reduce government or nonprofit programs that employ developmentally-disabled persons. Measure prohibits director, cities, and *38 counties from establishing or expanding inmate work programs that would: provide goods or services to the private sector and displace or significantly reduce opportunities for preexisting private enterprises; or displace or significantly reduce either non-inmate workers’ work opportunities or government or nonprofit programs that employ developmentally-disabled persons. Others provisions.

Ballot title certified. This decision shall become effective in accordance with ORAP 11.30(11).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 250.035
Oregon § 250.035
§ 250.085
Oregon § 250.085

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 P.3d 1023, 333 Or. 35, 2001 Ore. LEXIS 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nesbitt-v-myers-or-2001.