Nesbit v. Godfrey

25 A. 621, 155 Pa. 251, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1233
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 3, 1893·No. Appeal, No. 42·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We affirm this judgment upon the opinion of the learned judge of the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nesbit v. Godfrey, 25 A. 621, 155 Pa. 251, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1233 (Pa. 1893).

25 A. 621 (Nesbit v. Godfrey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McManus v. Acklin
62 Pa. D. & C. 527 (Washington County Court of Common Pleas, 1947)
Camac v. Reese
6 Pa. D. & C. 764 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1925)
Loughney v. Quigley
124 A. 84 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Pacific Mutual Life Insurance of California v. Alsop
134 N.E. 290 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1922)
Prager's Estate
74 Pa. Super. 592 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Nathan v. Sinclair
65 Pa. Super. 237 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)
Hutton v. Carnegie Natural Gas Co.
51 Pa. Super. 376 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1912)
Shrader v. T. W. Phillips Gas & Oil Co.
44 Pa. Super. 55 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1910)
Wilson v. Philadelphia Co.
60 A. 149 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1904)
Cairns v. Llewellyn
2 Pa. Super. 599 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)
Double v. Union Heat & Light Co.
33 A. 694 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)
Aderhold v. Oil Well Supply Co.
28 A. 22 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1893)