Nes v. Ramsay
This text of 26 A. 770 (Nes v. Ramsay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The facts agreed upon, including the clauses of the respective wills of A. Hamilton Nes, and Catharine E. Nes, deeds of William J. Nes to Eliza Nes, etc., upon which the questions in dispute arose, are fully set forth in the case stated. An examination of the record has satisfied us that the questions thus presented for the decision of the court below were rightly disposed of, and hence there was no error in entering judgment on the case stated for the defendant.
For reasons given in the opinion of the learned judge of the common pleas the judgment should be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A. 770, 155 Pa. 628, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nes-v-ramsay-pa-1893.