Neroni v. Follender

New York Court of Appeals

Neroni v. Follender

57 N.E.3d 1099, 27 N.Y.3d 1147, 37 N.Y.S.3d 61, 2016 NY Slip Op 78058, 2016 WL 3524572, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 1793

DecidedJune 28, 2016

StatusPublished

This text of 57 N.E.3d 1099 (Neroni v. Follender) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neroni v. Follender, 57 N.E.3d 1099, 27 N.Y.3d 1147, 37 N.Y.S.3d 61, 2016 NY Slip Op 78058, 2016 WL 3524572, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 1793 (N.Y. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks disqualification of Judges Stein and Fahey, dismissed as academic; motion, insofar as it seeks disqualification of Chief Judge DiFiore, dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals has no authority to entertain the motion made on nonstatutory grounds. The application seeking recusal of the Chief Judge is referred to her for individual consideration and determination. Chief Judge DiFiore denies the referred motion for recusal. On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from the December 2013 and April 2014 Supreme Court orders, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that it does not lie, and, insofar as taken from the Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for ancillary relief denied.

Judges Stein and Fahey taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks disqualification of Judges Stein and Fahey, dismissed as academic; motion, insofar as it seeks disqualification of Chief Judge DiFiore, dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals has no authority to entertain the motion made on nonstatutory grounds. The application seeking recusal of the Chief Judge is referred to her for individual consideration and determination. Chief Judge DiFiore denies the referred motion for recusal. On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from the December 2013 and April 2014 Supreme Court orders, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that it does not lie, and, insofar as taken from the Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for ancillary relief denied.

Judges Stein and Fahey taking no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 N.E.3d 1099, 27 N.Y.3d 1147, 37 N.Y.S.3d 61, 2016 NY Slip Op 78058, 2016 WL 3524572, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 1793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neroni-v-follender-ny-2016.