Nerius v. State

937 So. 2d 248, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14860, 2006 WL 2547121
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 6, 2006·No. No. 4D06-2681·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order summarily denying Defendant’s motion for postconviction relief as to four lower tribunal cases. See State v. Dickey, 928 So.2d 1193, 1198 (Fla.2006).

The summary record reflects that after the filing of the notice of appeal on June 14, 2006, the trial court on June 22 vacated portions of the order, because three of the four cases actually were assigned to other divisions. Because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to do so at the time that order was entered, we strike the June 22 order. The trial court may reenter the order when jurisdiction returns to the trial court, after the issuance of this court’s mandate.

GUNTHER, WARNER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nerius v. State, 937 So. 2d 248, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14860, 2006 WL 2547121 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

937 So. 2d 248 (Nerius v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weg Industrias v. Compania De Seguros
937 So. 2d 248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)