Neppl v. Fairway Pelham LLC

2019 NY Slip Op 3440
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 2, 2019
Docket9196 26627/15E
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 3440 (Neppl v. Fairway Pelham LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neppl v. Fairway Pelham LLC, 2019 NY Slip Op 3440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Neppl v Fairway Pelham LLC (2019 NY Slip Op 03440)
Neppl v Fairway Pelham LLC
2019 NY Slip Op 03440
Decided on May 2, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 2, 2019
Acosta, P.J., Friedman, Manzanet-Daniels, Gesmer, Singh, JJ.

9196 26627/15E

[*1]Sharon Neppl, Plaintiff,

v

Fairway Pelham LLC, Defendant-Respondent, Levin Properties, L.P., Defendant-Appellant.


Milber Makris Plousadis & Seiden, LLP, White Plains (Vincent Camacho of counsel), for appellant.

Cerussi & Spring, P.C., White Plains (Gabrielle R. Lang of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered on or about May 7, 2018, which granted the motion of defendant Fairway Pelham LLC (Fairway) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.

The governing lease between defendant Levin Properties, L.P. (Levin), the landlord of a large shopping center, and Fairway, a commercial tenant in the shopping center, unambiguously allocates to Levin the duty to maintain the shopping center parking lot, including keeping it free of snow and ice (see Waverly Corp. v City of New York, 48 AD3d 261, 264-65 [1st Dept 2008]). However, plaintiff does not allege where the accident occurred. Accordingly, at this stage, summary judgment was not appropriate.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MAY 2, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waverly Corp. v. City of New York
48 A.D.3d 261 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 3440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neppl-v-fairway-pelham-llc-nyappdiv-2019.