Nepper v. Wordehoff

173 N.W. 644, 42 S.D. 170, 1919 S.D. LEXIS 96
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 22, 1919
DocketFile No. 4549
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 173 N.W. 644 (Nepper v. Wordehoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nepper v. Wordehoff, 173 N.W. 644, 42 S.D. 170, 1919 S.D. LEXIS 96 (S.D. 1919).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Respondent moves to dismiss a purported appeal from an order. At the time the purported notice of appeal was served, no order had been made or entered. One was made three days after and entered some two weeks after the attempt to perfect an appeal. No authority is given by statute for the taking of an appeal prior to the entry of the order appealed from. Therefor the attempted appeal was premature and 'of no effect. Martin v. Smith, 11 S. D. 437, 78 N. W. 1001. There was no appeal; there is nothing to dismiss; but this court will treat 'the said ¡motion to dismiss as a motion to strike the [171]*171cause from the records of this court. Aldrich v. Public Opinion Pub. Co., 27 S. D. 589, 132 N. W. 278.

The cause should be, and is, stricken from the records of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Banfield v. Schulderman
3 P.2d 116 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 N.W. 644, 42 S.D. 170, 1919 S.D. LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nepper-v-wordehoff-sd-1919.