Nepivoda v. Pekurne
This text of 239 A.D. 854 (Nepivoda v. Pekurne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
None of the questions raised by the appellants requires discussion in a written memorandum unless it be a fact that the judgment of foreclosure directs the sale of real property which previously has been released from the lien of the mortgage. If this be true, it should be corrected by proper proceedings and amendments in the County Court of Ulster county, and the suit is remitted for that purpose. The order should be affirmed and matter remitted to Ulster County Court for such action as may be required concerning property, [855]*855if any, released from the lien of the mortgage but included in the judgment o£ foreclosure. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur. Order affirmed, and matter remitted to Ulster County Court for such action as may be required concerning property, if any, released from the lien of the mortgage but included in the judgment of foreclosure, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 A.D. 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nepivoda-v-pekurne-nyappdiv-1933.