Neo-Ray Products, Inc. v. Boro Electric Installation, Inc.

399 N.E.2d 952, 48 N.Y.2d 781, 423 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2442
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 15, 1979·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

*783 OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (65 AD2d 687).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neo-Ray Products, Inc. v. Boro Electric Installation, Inc., 399 N.E.2d 952, 48 N.Y.2d 781, 423 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2442 (N.Y. 1979).

399 N.E.2d 952 (Neo-Ray Products, Inc. v. Boro Electric Installation, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commercial Union Insurance v. Eastern Refractories Co.
240 A.D.2d 613 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Davis Wallbridge, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
103 A.D.2d 1010 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Gernatt Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Bensal Construction, Inc.
90 A.D.2d 993 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)