Nemlich v. Board of Education for the Pawling Central School District

170 F. App'x 727
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 6, 2006
DocketNo. 05-0473-CV
StatusPublished

This text of 170 F. App'x 727 (Nemlich v. Board of Education for the Pawling Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nemlich v. Board of Education for the Pawling Central School District, 170 F. App'x 727 (2d Cir. 2006).

Opinion

[728]*728SUMMARY ORDER

At a stated Term of the United Stated Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 6th day of March, two thousand and six.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Defendant-appellant the Board of Education for the Pawling Central School District (“the District”) appeals from the December 22, 2004, decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Brieant, /.) granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiffsappellees Bruce and Else Nemlich. The District also appeals the court’s award of $19,000.00 in tuition reimbursement and $22,312.50 in attorneys’ fees for the 2000-2001 school year. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and specification of issues on appeal.

We agree with the district court’s conclusion that it was appropriate to award tuition reimbursement under the pendency provision of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1415(j). We also agree that the parents were prevailing parties entitled to attorneys’ fees pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(3)(B).

Accordingly, substantially for the reasons set forth by the District Court, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Procedural safeguards
20 U.S.C. § 1415(j)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 F. App'x 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nemlich-v-board-of-education-for-the-pawling-central-school-district-ca2-2006.