Nemitz v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration
This text of 126 F. App'x 343 (Nemitz v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Gregory Nemitz appeals pro se from the district court’s dismissal of his complaint for failure to state a claim in his action seeking a declaratory judgment concerning alleged private property on the asteroid 433, “EROS.” We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order dismissing the complaint, filed on April 26, 2004.1
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 F. App'x 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nemitz-v-national-aeronautics-space-administration-ca9-2005.