Nemet v. Nemet

86 N.E.2d 184, 324 Mass. 754
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 10, 1949·Published

Opinion

Decree affirmed. Upon the husband’s petition, a decree was entered which stated, “the allegation of cruel and abusive treatment in the petition appearing to be true,” and which adjudged that the husband is living apart from the wife for justifiable cause. The wife appealed. We need not recite the reported evidence. In large measure the question concerned the credibility of -witnesses. We cannot say that the judge was plainly wrong. Harrington v. Harrington, 254 Mass. 506. Goren v. Goren, 310 Mass. 284. Levanosky v. Levanosky, 311 Mass. 638, 639.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nemet v. Nemet, 86 N.E.2d 184, 324 Mass. 754 (Mass. 1949).

86 N.E.2d 184 (Nemet v. Nemet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harrington v. Harrington
254 Mass. 506 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1926)
Goren v. Goren
37 N.E.2d 987 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)
Levanosky v. Levanosky
42 N.E.2d 561 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1942)