Nelson-Waller v. Waller
This text of 60 A.D.3d 1068 (Nelson-Waller v. Waller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the husband appeals from an order of protection of the Family Court, Orange County (Bivona, J.), dated July 15, 2008, which, after a hearing, and upon, in effect, a finding that he committed the family offense of disorderly conduct, inter alia, directed him to stay away from the wife for a period of two years.
Ordered that the order of protection is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
“A family offense must be established by a ‘fair preponderance of the evidence’ (Family Ct Act § 832). The Family Court’s determination regarding the credibility of witnesses must be given great weight on appeal unless clearly unsupported by the [1069]*1069record” (Matter of Hunt v Hunt, 51 AD3d 924, 925 [2008]). The record supports the Family Court’s finding that, based on a preponderance of the evidence, the husband committed acts constituting the family offense of disorderly conduct, warranting the issuance of the order of protection. Skelos, J.P., Dillon, Covello and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 A.D.3d 1068, 875 N.Y.S.2d 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-waller-v-waller-nyappdiv-2009.