Nelson v. Wong

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: December 1, 2005
• Docket: 05-1502
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1502

CINDY NELSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ARMFIELD WONG; VALERIE ZUCKERMAN; JANET DEMARZO; GEORGE PATAKI; DUDLEY LEHMAN; DAVID FREUNDLICH; JORDAN TRAGER; HEATHER NORTON; PHEON BEAL; MIKE EASLEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-307-5-F)

Submitted: November 22, 2005 Decided: December 1, 2005

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cindy Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Michael Gatto, SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF LAW, Hauppauge, New York; Joseph C. Moore, III, ALLEN & MOORE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Peter H. Schiff, NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Albany, New York; W. A. Holland, Jr., Smithfield, North Carolina; J. Mark Payne, JOHNSTON COUNTY ATTORNEY, Smithfield, North Carolina; Chris Zucco Sinha, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Cindy Nelson appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her civil action seeking review of state court

judgments. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Nelson v. Wong, No. CA-04-307-5-F (E.D.N.C.

Mar. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -