Nelson v. United States

392 U.S. 303, 88 S. Ct. 2062, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1109, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1364
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 10, 1968
Docket78 M
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 392 U.S. 303 (Nelson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. United States, 392 U.S. 303, 88 S. Ct. 2062, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1109, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1364 (1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968). Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John A. Hutter Et Ux. v. Bernard J. Korzen, Etc
409 U.S. 905 (Supreme Court, 1972)
People v. Thomas
190 N.W.2d 250 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)
Gary David Nelson v. United States
425 F.2d 188 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
392 U.S. 303, 88 S. Ct. 2062, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1109, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-united-states-scotus-1968.