Nelson v. . Tenney
20 N.E. 875, 113 N.Y. 616, 68 Sickels 616, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 987
Opinion
Agree to grant motion on ground that the Supreme Court had no power to grant an order allowing the appellant to perfect his appeal by filing an undertaking, and no reason is shown to tMs court excusing the delay.
All concur.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nelson v. . Tenney, 20 N.E. 875, 113 N.Y. 616, 68 Sickels 616, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 987 (N.Y. 1889).
20 N.E. 875 (Nelson v. . Tenney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morris v. Brokab Corp.
192 Misc. 1012 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1948)
In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Cunnion
138 A.D. 922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
In re Cunnion's Will
123 N.Y.S. 1113 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Bulkley v. Whiting Manufacturing Co.
136 A.D. 479 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)