Nelson v. Taylor

261 S.E.2d 579, 244 Ga. 657, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1362
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 16, 1979
Docket35384
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 261 S.E.2d 579 (Nelson v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. Taylor, 261 S.E.2d 579, 244 Ga. 657, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1362 (Ga. 1979).

Opinions

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

Roosevelt and Ruth Taylor filed a petition to adopt the illegitimate child of their son, Albert. The trial court granted the petition for adoption over the objection of the child’s mother, and upheld the adoption statutes against her constitutional attack. The mother appeals. We reverse.

1. Code Ann. § 74-403 (a) provides that "... no adoption of a child with living parent(s) or guardian(s) of his person shall be permitted except where ... (2) the parent(s) or the guardian(s) of the child has voluntarily and in writing surrendered all of his rights to the child to a third person(s) for the purpose of enabling that person(s) to adopt said child; or ... (4) the parent(s) of the child has voluntarily and in writing surrendered all of his rights to the child to a relative who is either a parent, brother or sister, aunt or uncle, or son or daughter of either parent; ...” (Emphasis supplied.)

Code Ann. § 74-404 (c) sets out the surrender form to be used by the parents in "voluntarily and in writing” giving up their rights to their child. A different form is required where the child is being surrendered to third persons than is necessary where the surrender is to relatives. The mother signed the (c) (1) form, appropriate for surrender to relatives, not the (c) (2) form, for surrender to third persons. She claims this was a defect [658]*658requiring dismissal of the adoption petition. We disagree.

The mother argues that under Code Ann. § 74-203 the mother of an illegitimate child is "the only recognized parent,” and that therefore the putative father’s parents are not "relatives” under the statute. It is clear, however, that the putative father is also a parent. Code Ann. § 74-202, for example, states that "[u]ntil majority, it is the joint and several duty of each parent of an illegitimate child to provide for the maintenance, protection and education of the child, . . .” (Emphasis supplied.) Furthermore, Code Ann. § 74-406 provides for notice to the biological father of the pending adoption, giving him the right to legitimate the child within 30 days, after which his consent is also necessary. This provision thus recognizes that a father has some parental rights, as well as duties, in regard to his illegitimate child. Compare Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U. S. 246 (1978), affg. 238 Ga. 230 (232 SE2d 246) (1977), where it appears that the extent of his rights is related to the performance of his duties as a parent. We therefore hold the parents of the biological father are "relatives,” Code Ann. § 74-403 (a)(4), and the proper surrender form was signed by the mother, Code Ann. § 74-404 (c)(1).

2. The mother next contends that her failure to sign the acknowledgement form set out in Code Ann. § 74-404 (c)(4) was also grounds for the trial court to dismiss the petition for adoption. We agree.

Code Ann. § 74-404 (c)(4) provides that "[a] surrender of parental rights shall be acknowledged by the parent(s) or guardian(s) signing in substantially the following form:” which is then set out in the section.1 The trial court [659]*659ruled that the mother had voluntarily relinquished her rights and had understood that she had ten days to withdraw her surrender, which she had not done. It further concluded that the petitioners for the adoption had "substantially complied with the requirements for adoption set out in Chapter 74-4 of the Georgia Code.” (Emphasis supplied.)

Code Ann. § 74-403 (a)(4) provides that "no adoption . . . shall be permitted except where ... (4) the parent(s) of the child has voluntarily and in writing surrendered all his rights to the child . . .” (Emphasis supplied.) Two writings are required. Code Ann. § 74-404 (c)(1) requires a surrender of parental rights, final release for adoption. This was executed. See Division 1, supra. Code Ann. § 74-404 (c)(4) requires an acknowledgment of surrender of parental rights. It avers that the surrender of parental rights has been read, a copy received, its provisions explained, an opportunity afforded to consult with counsel, and the surrender knowingly, intentionally, freely and voluntarily made. This was not executed. It is mandatory that the acknowledgement must also be in writing and signed by the parent. Adoption statutes [660]*660should be strictly construed and meticulously followed so that beyond all peradventure the adoption will not later be subject to attack. Since the proper forms were not submitted to the trial court, it erred in failing to dismiss the petition.

Submitted September 19, 1979 Decided October 16, 1979 Rehearing denied November 6, 1979. Robert Rosenblum, Roy M. Sobelson, John L. Cromartie, Jr., for appellant. Dennis J. Strickland, Sr., Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, for appellees.

Since we are here reversing the judgment of the trial court, we need not address the remaining enumerations of error.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Nichols, C. J., and Marshall, J., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wayne Hannah v. Sara Paige Hatcher
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2019
Rokowski v. Gilbert
620 S.E.2d 509 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2005)
Reeves v. Hayes
596 S.E.2d 668 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2004)
In Re Stroh
523 S.E.2d 887 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Spires v. Tarleton
483 S.E.2d 337 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Families First v. Gooden
439 S.E.2d 34 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Strickland v. State
438 S.E.2d 161 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Dover v. Dover
388 S.E.2d 35 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Welch v. Suggs
333 S.E.2d 31 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Wilkins v. Department of Human Resources
329 S.E.2d 266 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
In re H. C. S.
170 Ga. App. 551 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
In Re HCS
318 S.E.2d 59 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Johnson v. Smith
302 S.E.2d 542 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1983)
Tyson v. Department of Human Resources
301 S.E.2d 485 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Hayes v. Watkins
295 S.E.2d 556 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Williams v. Davenport
284 S.E.2d 45 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Chandler v. Cochran
275 S.E.2d 23 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 S.E.2d 579, 244 Ga. 657, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-taylor-ga-1979.