Nelson v. Stueve

821 P.2d 439, 110 Or. App. 142, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1851
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 4, 1991
DocketPB 86-8706; CA A66583
StatusPublished

This text of 821 P.2d 439 (Nelson v. Stueve) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. Stueve, 821 P.2d 439, 110 Or. App. 142, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1851 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to terminate the guardianship and conservatorship held by respondent. We reverse and remand.

On de novo review, we conclude that appellant is not an “incapacitated person” at the present time.1 She is capable of meeting essential health and safety requirements and managing her own affairs. She has no mental illness. She is an alcoholic, but we note that that condition is in remission and that she has been and is currently sober. There is no need to continue the guardianship or conservatorship.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter an order terminating guardianship and conservatorship.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 126.003
Oregon § 126.003

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
821 P.2d 439, 110 Or. App. 142, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-stueve-orctapp-1991.