Nelson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Nelson v. State

1912 OK CR 40, 119 P. 1131, 6 Okla. Crim. 707, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 289

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 5, 1912

DocketNo. A-1127.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 40 (Nelson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nelson v. State, 1912 OK CR 40, 119 P. 1131, 6 Okla. Crim. 707, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 289 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

R. L. Nelson, plaintiff in error, was convicted in the superior court of Muskogee county for the crime of selling intoxicating liquor, and was, on January 4, 1911, sentenced to serve a term of four months in the county jail and to pay a fine of four hundred dollars. To reverse this judgment an appeal was taken by filing in this court on May 4, 1911, a petition in error with ease-made. When' the case was called on the regular assignment for final submission the Attorney General moved to affirm for failure to prosecute the appéal. No briefs have been filed and no appearance made of behalf of plaintiff in error in this court. The appeal having been abandoned the motion to affirm is sustained. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

R. L. Nelson, plaintiff in error, was convicted in the superior court of Muskogee county for the crime of selling intoxicating liquor, and was, on January 4, 1911, sentenced to serve a term of four months in the county jail and to pay a fine of four hundred dollars. To reverse this judgment an appeal was taken by filing in this court on May 4, 1911, a petition in error with ease-made. When' the case was called on the regular assignment for final submission the Attorney General moved to affirm for failure to prosecute the appéal. No briefs have been filed and no appearance made of behalf of plaintiff in error in this court. The appeal having been abandoned the motion to affirm is sustained. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 40, 119 P. 1131, 6 Okla. Crim. 707, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.