Nelson v. State

527 S.W.3d 854
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 13, 2017
DocketNo. ED 104328
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 527 S.W.3d 854 (Nelson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. State, 527 S.W.3d 854 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Patrick Nelson appeals from the motion court’s “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment” (“Judgment”) denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nelson v. Payne
E.D. Missouri, 2021

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
527 S.W.3d 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-state-moctapp-2017.