Nelson v. State

318 S.W.3d 795, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1161, 2010 WL 3398551
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 31, 2010·No. ED 93053·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darryl K. Nelson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nelson v. State, 318 S.W.3d 795, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1161, 2010 WL 3398551 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

318 S.W.3d 795 (Nelson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dizdar v. City of St. Louis
318 S.W.3d 795 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)