Nelson v. State
91 S.E. 219, 19 Ga. App. 141, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 26
Opinion
There was direct evidence to support the verdict of guilty. The motives actuating the witnesses for the State were for consideration by the jury in weighing their testimony, and may not be inquired into by this court. There was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial, which was based on general grounds only.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nelson v. State, 91 S.E. 219, 19 Ga. App. 141, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 26 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
91 S.E. 219 (Nelson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farley v. State
187 S.E.2d 558 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)