Nelson v. State
805 So. 2d 1071, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 725, 2002 WL 112567
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 30, 2002·No. No. 3D00-906·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the order denying defendant’s Rule 3.850 motion on all grounds except the ground attacking his sentence as a prison releasee reoffender. The sentencing transcripts do not clearly reflect the court’s intent. We remand this cause to the trial court for clarification as to whether the court intended to sentence defendant as a prison releasee reoffender. See Lee v. State, 777 So.2d 418 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
Affirmed, in part; cause remanded for clarification.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nelson v. State, 805 So. 2d 1071, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 725, 2002 WL 112567 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
805 So. 2d 1071 (Nelson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nelson v. State
20 So. 3d 979 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)