Nelson v. State

776 So. 2d 1130, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1319, 2001 WL 120062
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nelson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 719 So. 2d 1230
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 14, 2001·No. No. 1D00-1209·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Following his convictions for two counts of armed robbery, the appellant in this direct criminal appeal challenges his concurrent ten-year minimum mandatory sentences imposed pursuant to section 775 .087(2), Florida Statutes (1999). We agree that the sentences must be vacated because, as the appellee concedes, there was no evidence that the appellant “actually possessed” a firearm during the commission of his crimes, as required for application of the ten-year minimum mandatory sentence prescribed by section 775.087(2). See Earnest v. State, 351 So.2d 957 (Fla.1977). The sentences are accordingly vacated and this case is remanded to the trial court for resentencing.

ERVIN, BOOTH and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nelson v. State, 776 So. 2d 1130, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1319, 2001 WL 120062 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

776 So. 2d 1130 (Nelson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Earnest v. State
351 So. 2d 957 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)