Nelson v. State

406 So. 2d 539, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21604
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 1981·No. No. 81-1238·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from denial of appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. The basis for relief at the trial level was violation of the speedy trial rule in the proceedings which led to appellant’s conviction. Habeas corpus may not be used as a vehicle to raise issues appropriate for direct appeal. Hargrave v. Wainwright, 388 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1980). Appellant indicates in his brief that the time for appeal from his conviction has not ripened. If that be the fact, then the rule we rely on applies with even greater force. See Ferenc v. Thursby, 212 So.2d 887 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968).

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, C. J., and HERSEY and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nelson v. State, 406 So. 2d 539, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21604 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

406 So. 2d 539 (Nelson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gray v. Wainwright
442 So. 2d 312 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)