Nelson v. Stansberry

Fourth Circuit

Nelson v. Stansberry

126 F. App'x 141

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 20, 2005·No. No. 04-8003·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Renard Nelson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Nelson v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-615 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Renard Nelson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Nelson v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-615 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Nelson v. Stansberry, 126 F. App'x 141 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

126 F. App'x 141 (Nelson v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related