Nelson v. Smith

3 Abb. Pr. 117
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedMay 15, 1856
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Abb. Pr. 117 (Nelson v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. Smith, 3 Abb. Pr. 117 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1856).

Opinion

Ingraham, F., J.

There was no valid objection to the assignment of the claim to the plaintiff. It was executed by the assignor and delivered to Brown for the plaintiff. The fact of its being made to enable the assignor to testify is no objection now, except to his credibility. There are very few cases in which a claim is assigned where such is not the real motive, although it is often sought to disguise such motives under some other plausible excuse. The legislature has seen fit to sanction such proceedings, and the courts are bound to carry out their enactments, however unjustly they may operate in individual cases.

(We omit a passage of the opinion, disposing briefly of questions raised upon the merits.)

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Abb. Pr. 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-smith-nyctcompl-1856.