Nelson v. Saul

District Court, N.D. Illinois·Decided January 31, 2024·No. 3:20-cv-50388·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION Patricia N., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. 20 C 50388 ) Vv. ) Hon. Philip G. Reinhard ) Martin O’ Malley, ) Magistrate Judge Margaret J. Schneider Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER This matter comes before the court on the January 3, 2024 Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) [31] of Magistrate Judge Schneider recommending that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [19] be denied and the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment [22] be granted. The court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. /d. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). In this case, any objections were required to be filed by January 17, 2024. No objections have been received by this court. The court has reviewed the record in this case and finds that the R&R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the court adopts in its entirety Magistrate Judge Schneider’s R&R and denies plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and grants the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment. Date: 1/31/2024 ENTER:

United States District Court Judge Electronic Notices.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nelson v. Saul, (N.D. Ill. 2024).

Nelson v. Saul (Nelson v. Saul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.