Nelson v. Ryan
This text of 222 A.D. 754 (Nelson v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order and judgment reversed upon the law and the facts and new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. We are of opinion that plaintiff presented a prima facie ease. The dismissal was not upon the merits. A dismissal in an equity case, without findings of fact and conclusions of law, must be regarded as a non-suit. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 441; Stephenson v. Southerland, 150 App. Div. 275; Ross v. Caywood, 162 N. Y. 259; Ware v. Dos Passos, Id. 281; Mc Nulty Brothers v. Offerman, 141 App. Div. 730.) If it be the intent to dismiss upon the merits, a decision must be made pursuant to section 440 of the Civil Practice Act. This rule is not changed by section 482 of the act. Young, Rich, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Lazansky, J., concurs in result.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 A.D. 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-ryan-nyappdiv-1927.