Nelson v. Rodas

132 F. App'x 401
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJune 1, 2005
DocketNo. 04-4376-PR
StatusPublished

This text of 132 F. App'x 401 (Nelson v. Rodas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. Rodas, 132 F. App'x 401 (2d Cir. 2005).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff-Appellant Jeffrey A. Nelson (“Nelson”), proceeding pro se, is a prisoner at the Green Haven Correctional Facility (“Green Haven”). He filed the instant civil rights action in the Southern District of New York against various officials and medical care providers at Green Haven, alleging, that the Defendants-Appellees violated, inter alia, his Eighth Amendment right to adequate medical care.1 The district court granted summary judgment to the Defendants-Appellees on all of Nelson’s claims, and dismissed Nelson’s complaint in its entirety.

We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, the procedural history, and the scope of the issues presented on appeal. We affirm the grant of summary judgment dismissing Nelson’s complaint substantially for the reasons given by the district court.

We have considered all of Nelson’s contentions on appeal and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 F. App'x 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-rodas-ca2-2005.