Nelson v. Robinson

454 F. App'x 174
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 17, 2011
DocketNo. 11-6785
StatusPublished

This text of 454 F. App'x 174 (Nelson v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. Robinson, 454 F. App'x 174 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

George Patton Nelson, III, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny as moot Nelson’s motion for injunctive relief pending appeal, and we affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated by the district court. Nelson v. Robinson, No. 3:08-cv-00603-HEH, 2011 WL 2358542 (E.D. Va. June 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
454 F. App'x 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-robinson-ca4-2011.