Nelson v. Quail

19 Ohio C.C. 633
CourtOhio Circuit Courts
DecidedOctober 15, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 19 Ohio C.C. 633 (Nelson v. Quail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. Quail, 19 Ohio C.C. 633 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).

Opinion

Hale, J.

The judgment of the court of common pleas is affirmed.

We have found no statute conferring authority upon the mayor to sign and allow a bill of exceptions after final judgment and the overruing of the motion for a new trial.

And, in thus holding we follow the case of the Village of Bradner of Wood County v. George Grundertich, 15 C. C. Rep., 32.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Ohio C.C. 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-quail-ohiocirct-1899.