Nelson v. Quail

10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 394
CourtCuyahoga Circuit Court
DecidedDecember 22, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 394 (Nelson v. Quail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Cuyahoga Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. Quail, 10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 394 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).

Opinion

Hale j.

The judgment of the court of common pleas is affirmed.

We have found no statute conferring authority upon the mayor to sign and allow a bill of exceptions after final judgment and the overruling of the motion for a new trial.

And, in thus holding, we follow the case of Bradner (Village) v. Grundetisch, 8 Circ. Dec., 122.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-quail-ohcirctcuyahoga-1899.