Nelson v. Pitcher

180 So. 22, 131 Fla. 871
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 1, 1938
StatusPublished

This text of 180 So. 22 (Nelson v. Pitcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. Pitcher, 180 So. 22, 131 Fla. 871 (Fla. 1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal brings for review decree of foreclosure of mortgage.

The mortgagor was a feme sole at the time of the execu *872 tion of the notes and mortgage securing the same. She afterwards married C. A. Nelson.

The defense was in effect that the mortgagor was of such unsound mind at the time of the execution of the notes and mortgage as to render her incompetent to contract and be contracted with.

The issue of mental incapacity was presented by the pleadings and voluminous testimony was taken.

The Chancellor found that the mortgagor was mentally competent to contract at the time of the execution and delivery of the notes and mortgage and that the notes were given for a valuable consideration.

We find that the record discloses substantial evidence to support the findings and the decree and we must decline to disturb the same. See Pierce v. Brand Properties, Inc., and authorities there cited. Opinion filed January 5, 1938, and reported 178 Sou. 168.

The decree is affirmed.

So ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pierce v. Brand Properties, Inc.
178 So. 168 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 So. 22, 131 Fla. 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-pitcher-fla-1938.