Nelson v. Parole & Probation Compact Administrators' Ass'n

86 F. App'x 600
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 4, 2004
DocketNo. 03-2121
StatusPublished

This text of 86 F. App'x 600 (Nelson v. Parole & Probation Compact Administrators' Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. Parole & Probation Compact Administrators' Ass'n, 86 F. App'x 600 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Edward K. Nelson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Nelson v. Parole & Probation Compact Administrators’ Ass’n, No. CA-03-670-3-13BD (D.S.C. filed Aug. 19, 2003 & entered Aug. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 F. App'x 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-parole-probation-compact-administrators-assn-ca4-2004.